APEX-Agents leaderboard
APEX-Agents leaderboard: pass rate on long-horizon investment banking, consulting and corporate law tasks for each LLM agent, plotted against API price. Current leader: Gemini 4 Argon at 82.4 (% pass@1).
Gemini 4 Argon leads APEX-Agents with 82.4 at $10.0 per 1M output tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5 follows at 75.5.
Gemini 4 Argon is both the top scorer and the cheapest way to a near-top score, at $10.0 per 1M output tokens.
GLM-5.3 is the best open-weight model at 56.6, 25.8 points behind the leader, at $1.40 per 1M output tokens.
Cost vs quality
APEX-Agents: score against cost
Each dot is a model. Top-left is best: a high score for a low cost. The dashed line is the value frontier.
APEX-Agents leaderboard
| Model | % pass@1 | Output $ / 1M | Released |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82.4 | $10.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 2 | 75.5 | $10.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 3 | 73.5 | $20.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 4 | 68.6 | $50.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 5 | 67.8 | $3.75 | Aug 2026 |
| 6 | 65.8 | $25.0 | Jul 2026 |
| 7 | 65.3 | $6.00 | Aug 2026 |
| 8 | 64.7 | $50.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 9 | 64.3 | $4.13 | Sep 2026 |
| 10 | 63.6 | $50.0 | Jun 2026 |
| 11 | 63.3 | — | Jul 2026 |
| 12 | 60 | $10.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 13Muse Spark 1.3 | 58.6 | — | Sep 2026 |
| 14 | 58.2 | $12.0 | Jul 2026 |
| 15 | 56.6 | $1.40 | Aug 2026 |
| 16 | 56.2 | $6.00 | Jul 2026 |
| 17 | 56.1 | $0.50 | Oct 2026 |
| 18 | 55.1 | $30.0 | Apr 2026 |
| 19 | 54.6 | $6.00 | Sep 2026 |
| 20 | 54.5 | $10.0 | Jun 2026 |
| 21 | 54.3 | $10.0 | Sep 2026 |
| 22 | 52.8 | $0.20 | Aug 2026 |
| 23 | 52.4 | $15.0 | Mar 2026 |
| 24 | 51.4 | $20.0 | Jul 2026 |
| 25 | 49.2 | $25.0 | Apr 2026 |
| 26 | 48.9 | $25.0 | May 2026 |
| 27 | 47.8 | $11.9 | Jul 2026 |
| 28 | 47.5 | $2.50 | Aug 2026 |
| 29 | 47.3 | $1.98 | Aug 2026 |
| 30 | 46.9 | $3.75 | Jul 2026 |
| 31 | 46.3 | $25.0 | Feb 2026 |
| 32Muse Spark 1.2 | 45.4 | — | Aug 2026 |
| 33 | 45.2 | $7.00 | Jun 2026 |
| 34 | 44.3 | $0.50 | Sep 2026 |
| 35 | 43 | $15.0 | Feb 2026 |
| 36 | 43 | $1.20 | Jul 2026 |
| 37 | 40.9 | $4.40 | Apr 2026 |
| 38 | 39.5 | $1.20 | Sep 2026 |
| 39 | 37.7 | — | Jun 2026 |
| 40 | 37.6 | $3.35 | Jun 2026 |
| 41 | 35.1 | $12.0 | Feb 2026 |
| 42InklingOpen | 33.8 | — | Jul 2026 |
| 43Muse Spark OpenOpen | 33.4 | — | Oct 2026 |
| 44Muse Spark 1.1 | 31.8 | — | Jul 2026 |
| 45 | 29.3 | $2.50 | Jul 2026 |
| 46 | 27.5 | $9.00 | May 2026 |
| 47 | 24.9 | $3.60 | Feb 2026 |
| 48Nemotron 3 UltraOpen | 22.7 | — | Jun 2026 |
| 49 | 21.3 | — | Dec 2025 |
| 50 | 4.4 | — | Aug 2025 |
Scores from Epoch AI, updated —. Cost is joined from our daily API pricing where a model matches; models we do not price still appear with their score. Always verify on the benchmark's own site before relying on a number.
What APEX-Agents measures
APEX-Agents was created by Mercor to test whether AI agents can do long-horizon, cross-application work in professional services. It contains 480 tasks, 160 each in investment banking, management consulting and corporate law, set in 33 simulated work environments that each average more than 160 files. Industry professionals with five to ten years of experience at top-tier firms built the worlds and tasks, each around a realistic scenario such as a week-long consulting engagement.
Agents use the tools a human professional would: documents, spreadsheets, presentations, PDFs, email, chat, a calendar, a file system and code execution, with web search disabled so runs are reproducible. Each task has an expert-written rubric of one to ten binary criteria, and a judge model checks each criterion against the agent's output. A task passes only if every criterion is met, and the headline number is pass@1. Mercor estimates the tasks take a human professional about 1.8 hours on average.
How to read this page
This is the closest benchmark on the site to "can an agent do a white-collar job step". The cost chart uses output price per 1M tokens, but an agent run here also reads large file sets and makes many tool calls, so input tokens and caching matter more than on a one-shot question. Use the price axis to see which tier of model is good enough, and then price a realistic trajectory with the agent cost calculator rather than trusting the per-token figure alone.
Limitations
Passing requires every rubric criterion, so the metric is strict and a single missed detail fails a task. Grading uses a judge model, which adds its own bias and noise. The tasks are confined to three professions and to simulated environments, so results may not transfer to other kinds of work or to messier real workplaces. The benchmark is open source (tasks and worlds under CC-BY, with the Archipelago environment released openly), which helps reproducibility but also means the tasks can leak into training data.